Thursday, 2018-11-22

r0kk3rzhmm i think merobs doesnt like this whole metapackage idea10:30
malr0kk3rz: I think we need to think it a bit more, I have some ideas11:21
r0kk3rzmal: thinking? pfft. hacking!11:39
r0kk3rzmal: what were your thoughts anyway?12:38
malr0kk3rz: building the meta packages togethet with the main config package and not from separate specs12:40
r0kk3rzso basically adding the extra requires onto the droid-config-device spec12:41
malr0kk3rz: or some separate place, the packages can be separate still but building would happen from the same spec12:42
r0kk3rzyeah that would be a bit nicer12:46
r0kk3rzinstead of having several packages for the same source on obs12:46
r0kk3rzmal: im not sure how we could do that though :)12:54
malr0kk3rz: I'll do some testing tonight13:03
r0kk3rzregardless, the whole seperate spec thing should work, and it doesnt13:04
malr0kk3rz: true, but we want to minimize differences to usage, having to build more packages would be complicated13:18
r0kk3rznot overly13:20
r0kk3rzid argue its a lot less complicated than hoping and praying that your patterns get regenerated13:20
malbuilding those using one spec is even simpler, should be possible13:26
r0kk3rzbut my main point is, why it no work?13:26
r0kk3rzonce it works, then we can make it betterer13:26
r0kk3rzwhich is mostly just hacking at the scripts a bit more13:27
r0kk3rzah ok, it needs to have an empty %files at the end...13:43
r0kk3rzwoo, that looks like its working14:06
malr0kk3rz: yes, each package needs at least an empty %files section for it14:12
r0kk3rzit'd be nice if that was obvious :P14:17

Generated by 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at!