| T4 | <aa_sokolov> Hello. I have tried to build an image using nemo-clean.ks file. It was successful last time, but now I receive dependency resolving issues: … repo problem: nothing provides libicui18n.so.52 needed by qt5-qtcore-5.6.3+git8-1.4.25.armv7hl … and … repo problem: nothing provides libgcrypt.so.11 needed by systemd-225+git11-1.10.24.armv7hl … | 10:21 |
|---|---|---|
| T4 | Do anybody meet same issues? | 10:21 |
| T4 | <aa_sokolov> [Edit] Hello. I have tried to build an image using nemo-clean.ks file. It was successful last time, but now I receive dependency resolving issues: … repo problem: nothing provides libicui18n.so.52 needed by qt5-qtcore-5.6.3+git8-1.4.25.armv7hl … and … repo problem: nothing provides libgcrypt.so.11 needed by systemd-225+git11-1.10.24.ar | 10:21 |
| T4 | mv7hl … Have anybody met same issues? | 10:21 |
| T4 | <abranson> there's been an update to icu in sailfish devel, along with some reduction in dependency on nss in various packages so it becomes less important to the core build. | 10:26 |
| T4 | <neochapay> @aa_sokolov [Hello. I have tried to build an image using ne …], It because we have broken systemd and can't rebuild all packages | 10:26 |
| T4 | <aa_sokolov> So sad :( Ok, am I understand right that there are no backup repos to build image from old packets? | 10:28 |
| T4 | <neochapay> @aa_sokolov [So sad :( Ok, am I understand right that there …], Or wait :) | 10:28 |
| T4 | <aa_sokolov> (Sticker, 512x512) http://3das7vpgt73yxclb6agz4sz2a2bt7bqqfjucjhhbb5jnndxcd4o4lfid.onion/YTcXvio3vL.webp | 10:29 |
| T4 | <aa_sokolov> @neochapay [Or wait :)], Ok :) | 10:29 |
| T4 | <neochapay> @aa_sokolov [Ok :)], We work about that problem. It's bug of gcc i think... | 10:35 |
| T4 | <aa_sokolov> Sounds bad. So, there were gcc update and now systemd doesn't build, right? | 11:19 |
| T4 | <abranson> sometimes it's necessary to juggle the builds around until they work. it all should build correctly together as it already does for sailfish. | 11:52 |
| T4 | <aa_sokolov> How can I create account on OBS? Is it possible for now? | 12:10 |
| T4 | <K31j0> contact lbt on irc | 12:16 |
| T4 | <aa_sokolov> Ok, thx | 12:17 |
| lbt | :) | 12:20 |
| NeoChapay | lbt: https://webhook.merproject.org/webhook/api/webhookmappings/?project=home%3Aneochapay%3Amer%3Acore&obs=mobs&package=mce webhook broken | 12:45 |
| lbt | missed him | 13:07 |
| T4 | <m_aurel> Hello Nemo friends, we made some motivating progress with Jolla. However Leif will have some further questions at the weekend. | 13:45 |
| T4 | <m_aurel> I can confirm, that shipping Sailfish on a commercial product is not permitted. Even publishing a community port is a critical. As soon a developer would sell a port, it would violate the license agreement. Othervise it is obviously tolerated by Jolla. For sure they are interested in a lively community. | 13:49 |
| T4 | <DibyaXP> @m_aurel well can we have some insight with regards to motivating progress ? | 13:58 |
| T4 | <meierrom> @m_aurel [I can confirm, that shipping Sailfish on a com …], I don't think it's about Jolla tolerating it. You can read the EULA yourself or give it to your lawyer. It comes with every device running Sfos. :) | 18:33 |
| r0kk3rz | there is also legal info in the hadk with what you're permitted to do | 22:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.1 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!
